בעמוד זה מרוכזת רשימת מקורות העוסקים באתיקה במחקר בבני אדם ובבקרה על מחקרים אלו באקדמיה.

1. AAUP (American Association of University Professors) (2006) Research on human subjects: academic freedom and the Institutional Review Board. Available online at: http://www.aaup.org/AAUP/About/committees/committee‏_repts/CommA/ResearchonHumanSubjects.htm (accessed 20 August 2007).
2. Adler, P. A., & Adler, P. (2002). Do university lawyers and the police define research values? In W. C. van den Hoonaard (Ed.), Walking the tightrope: Ethical issues for qualitative researchers (pp. 34–42). Toronto: University of Toronto Press
3. Baker, R. B., Caplan, A. L., Emanuel, L. L., & Latham, S. R. (Eds.) (1999). The American Medical Ethics Revolution: How the AMA's Code of Ethics Has Transformed Physicians' Relationships to Patients, Professionals, and Society. Baltimore, MD.: The Johns Hopkins U. Press.
4. Bosk, C. L., & De Vries, R. G. (2004). Bureaucracies of mass deception: Institutional Review Boards and the ethics of ethnographic research. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, 595(1), 249-263.
5. Ceci S.J., Peters D, & Plotkin J. (1985). Human Subjects Review, Personal Values, and the Regulation of Social Science Research, American Psychologist, 40(9), 994-1002.
6. Cohen, J. (Nov., 1998). The federal perspective on ERBs. APS Observer, 5, 19.
7. De Vries, R., DeBruin, D. A., & Goodgame, A. (2004). Ethics review of social, behavioral and economic research: Where should we go from here?  Ethics & Behavior, 14(4), 351-368.
8. Dingwell, R. (2008). The ethical case against ethical regulation in humanities and social science research. Twenty-First Century Society: Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 3(1), 1-12.
9. Dubois, J. M. & James, M. (2004). Is compliance a professional virtue of researchers? Reflections on promoting the responsible conduct of research. Ethics & Behavior, 14, 383-395.
10. Edgar, H., & Rothman, D. J. (2003). The Institutional Review Board and beyond: future challenges to the ethics of human experimentation. In Emanuel, E.J., Crouch. R.A., Arras, J.D., Moreno, J.D., & Grady. C. (Eds.) (2003). Ethical and Regulatory aspects of clinical research: readings and commentary (pp. 436-440). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Edwards. J. L., Kirchin, S., & Huxtable, R.(2004). Research ethics committees and paternalism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 88-91.
12. Emanuel, E.J., Crouch. R.A., Arras, J.D., Moreno, J.D., & Grady. C. (Eds.) (2003). Ethical and Regulatory aspects of clinical research: readings and commentary. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
13. Ferraro, F. R., Szigeti, E., Dawes, K. J., & Pan, S. (1999). A survey regarding the University of North Dakota Institutional Review Board: Data, attitudes, and perceptions. Journal of Psychology, 133, 272-276.
14. Frenkel, D. (2000). Ultra-Vires and the research-limiting policy. Medicine and Law, 23, 55-60 [Hebrew].
15. Haggerty, K.D. (2004). Ethics creep: governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 391-414.
16. Hamburger, P. (2005). The new censorship: Institutional Review Boards. The Supreme Court Review, (2004), 271–354.
17. Hedgecoe, A. (2008). Research ethics review and the sociological research relationship. Sociology, 42(5), 873-886.
18. Hedgecoe, A. (2009). "A form of practical machinery": The origins of research ethics committees in the UK, 1967-1972. Medical History, 53, 331-350.
19. Hedgecoe, A. M. (2012). Trust and regulatory organizations: The role of local knowledge and facework in research ethics review. Social Studies of Science, 1, 1-22.
20. Hyder, A.A., Wali, S.A., Khan, A.N., Teoh, N.B., Kass, N.E., & Dawson, L. (2004). Ethical review of health research: a perspective from developing country researchers. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 68-72.
21. Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2006). Research ethics for social scientists. Thousand Park, CA: Sage.
22. Keith-Spiegel, P. & Koocher, G. P.(2005). The ERB paradox: Could the protectors also encourage deceit? Ethics & Behavior, 15(4), 339-349.
23. Keith-Spiegel, P., Koocher, G. P., & Tabachnick, B. (2006). What Scientists Want from Their Research Ethics Committee. An International Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 1(1), 67-82.
24. Kim, W.O. (2012). Institutional review board (IRB) and ethical issues in clinical research. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 62(1), 3-12.
25. Koren, D. (2003). Evidence based ethics: On values, facts and research methods in the field of professional ethics. In G. Shefler, Y. Achmon, & G. Weil (Eds.) Ethical Issues for Professionals in the Counseling and Psychotherapy (pp. 620-635). Jerusalem: Magnes [Hebrew].
26. Landau, R. (2008). Social work research ethics: dual roles and boundary issues. Families in Society, 89(4), 571-577.
27. Landau, R.  & Shefler, G. (Eds.). (2007). Research ethics. The Hebrew University Magnes Press, Jerusalem. [Hebrew].
28. Lincoln, Y.S., & Tierney, W.G. (2004). Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry, 10(2), 219-234.
29. Malouf, J. M., & Schutte, N. S.(2005). Academic psychologists’ perspective on the human research ethics review process. Australian Psychologist, 40, 57-62.
30. Palce, J. (1996). Institutional review boards: A net too thin. Hastings Center Report, 26, 4.
31. Pritchard, I.A. (2002). Travelers and trolls: Practitioner research and institutional review boards. Educational Researcher, 31(3), 3-13.
32. Rubin, S. (2010). Psychological ethics in Israel: Riding the winds of fashion to guide transformative changes. Ethics and Behavior, 20(3-4), 265-276.
33. Rubin, S. (2011). Ethics at Israeli universities: Unlearned lessons from professional ethics. Medicine and Law, 30, 65-78.
34. Rubin, S., & Koren, D. (2003). Research ethics: basic background and practical proposals. In G. Shefler, Y. Achmon, & G. Weil (Eds.) Ethical Issues for Professionals in the Counseling and Psychotherapy  (pp. 603-613). Jerusalem: Magnes [Hebrew].
35. Schrag Z.M. (2010) Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences 5-6.
36. Shaw, S., Boynton, P. M., & Greenhalgh, T. (2005). Research governance: where did it come from, what does it mean? JRSM - Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 98 (11), 496-502.
37. Silberner, J.(1998). Remodeling ERBs. Hastings Center Report, 28, 5.
38. Stark, L. (2007). Victims in our own minds? IRBs in myth and practice. Law and Society Review, 41(4), 777-786.
39. Stark, L. (2010).  The science of ethics: Deception, the resilient self, and the APA code of ethics, 1966-1973. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 46(4), 337-370.
40. Stark, L. (2013). Reading trust between the lines: "Housekeeping work" and inequality in human subjects review. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 22, 391-399.
41. Wainwright, P. & Saunders, J. (2004). What are local Issues? The problem of the local review in research. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 313-317.